Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
Roberto Ostinelli <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:30:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFXp3LLPPxnagNRyL_8H-P3kwdApanb1SnYu5d23AwZXZyehxg@mail.gmail.com> |
May I ask why the decision wasn't to make a "beam forum" and join Elixir & Erlang discussions in a single place? If the intent is to unify places and concentrate resources, that could have been helpful. I too will miss this mailing list, but at least I would have taken some comfort in not seeing the beam community spread around, and duplication of discussions & efforts. My $0.02, r. On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:52 PM Justin Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > Kenneth & co have limited time and resources, > > This is completely understandable. A given person or team only has a set > amount of time in a day to work on things. > > > It would be interesting to see the numbers for how much money and effort > > it takes to run a mailing list -vs- a forum. > > This is something that also interests me. If this is something that is > truly about money and effort to run the mailing list vs the forum, would > it be possible to do with the mailing list what has been done with the > forum? Have someone (or a group) run it and have Kenneth and other > members of the OTP team participate? I'm sure there are people in this > list that would be more than happy to help maintain these mailing lists > in some way, myself included. > > > It seems to me that the people making the decision about deprecating > > the mailing list were honestly *convinced* that the change would be > > better for *everyone*, because it *is* better (as an information > > source) for *them*. > > Since the Erlang Forum has been likened to the Elixir Forum (because it > is run by the same people), I just want to throw out there that Elixir > maintains a core mailing list where all discussion around new features > is supposed to take place. So maybe it doesn't make sense to completely > remove all of Erlang's mailing lists? Why does it have to be an either > or? > > > There is good will on all sides of this discussion. > > I agree with this statement. I believe everyone involved truly cares > about Erlang and the overall health of the community. I don't think > anyone is truly here just for the sake of arguing. > > Justin >