Re: [ANN] Khepri 0.2.1 - A tree-like replicated on-disk database library
Ilya Khaprov <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:40:54 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PAXPR06MB75672DBB406E64C37C1A02CFF4379@PAXPR06MB7567.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> |
Hey, You are welcome to ignore triggers here as well Ilusha ________________________________ From: erlang-questions <[email protected]> on behalf of I Gusti Ngurah Oka Prinarjaya <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 3:36:31 PM To: Jean-Sébastien Pédron <[email protected]> Cc: Erlang <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ANN] Khepri 0.2.1 - A tree-like replicated on-disk database library >>> The release notes of 0.2.0 [2] describe the highlights of Khepri 0.2.x >>> in detail, but I would like to quickly talk about the biggest one: >>> triggers and stored procedures! Triggers in an RDBMS database are a nightmare. I never use trigger in MySQL / PostgreSQL / etc RDBMS. I worried the trigger feature in Khepri will also become a nightmare. Please reconsider adding a trigger feature. Pada tanggal Jum, 18 Feb 2022 pukul 19.21 Jean-Sébastien Pédron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> menulis: On 18/02/2022 11:21, Frank Muller wrote: > Do you provide (throughput / latency) benchmarks? Thank you! No, I didn't make any benchmarking. It looks slower in RabbitMQ, but the library and the integration are still early stage. I need to measure it properly and share the result for sure! -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron