Re: [ANN] Khepri 0.2.1 - A tree-like replicated on-disk database library

Ilya Khaprov <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:40:54 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <PAXPR06MB75672DBB406E64C37C1A02CFF4379@PAXPR06MB7567.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Hey,

You are welcome to ignore triggers here as well

Ilusha
________________________________
From: erlang-questions <[email protected]> on behalf of I Gusti Ngurah Oka Prinarjaya <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 3:36:31 PM
To: Jean-Sébastien Pédron <[email protected]>
Cc: Erlang <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Khepri 0.2.1 - A tree-like replicated on-disk database library

>>> The release notes of 0.2.0 [2] describe the highlights of Khepri 0.2.x
>>> in detail, but I would like to quickly talk about the biggest one:
>>> triggers and stored procedures!

Triggers in an RDBMS database are a nightmare. I never use trigger in MySQL / PostgreSQL / etc RDBMS.
I worried the trigger feature in Khepri will also become a nightmare. Please reconsider adding a trigger feature.



Pada tanggal Jum, 18 Feb 2022 pukul 19.21 Jean-Sébastien Pédron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> menulis:
On 18/02/2022 11:21, Frank Muller wrote:
> Do you provide (throughput / latency) benchmarks?

Thank you!

No, I didn't make any benchmarking. It looks slower in RabbitMQ, but the
library and the integration are still early stage.

I need to measure it properly and share the result for sure!

--
Jean-Sébastien Pédron