Re: [ANN] Khepri 0.2.1 - A tree-like replicated on-disk database library

Frank Muller <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Mar 2022 00:12:49 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <CAFA6GnD5Ccg5ksq+1Bu-M-9gUa-Q1uO4EYVjdr082fwNFDA8tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jean-Sébastien,

Very promising. Would it be possible to test insert (50%) + delete (25%) +
update (%25) in the same time? You can vary the numbers of course.

How about “gets”? Are they faster in Khepri?

Best
F.

[email protected]> a écrit :

> On 18/02/2022 11:21, Frank Muller wrote:
> > Do you provide (throughput / latency) benchmarks?
>
> Hi!
>
> I prepared a first micro-benchmark tool to compare Khepri and Mnesia:
> https://github.com/rabbitmq/khepri-benchmark
>
> The README explains what it measures and how it works. In particular, it
> only tests operations per second, not latency.
>
> Results are automatically published from GitHub Actions to the following
> page (though remember that the CI runner only has 2 CPU cores):
>
>
> --
> Jean-Sébastien Pédron
>