Re: options for high-throughput connections between nodes
"Dave Cottlehuber" <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:10:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, at 10:48, Karl Nilsson wrote: > Osiris is quite a different type of thing to the other ones in your > list in that it will always first write terms to disk and only then > replicate them (over TCP). That said it could do a decent replication > job if you want a local buffer to decouple the production of terms from > the replication part. Osiris does still need a dist erl connection for > coordination messages and you'd have to modify the quorum commit > semantics to fit your use case (e.g. a "leader" member on the > production side and a "replica" member on the other side). > > Cheers > Karl Thanks Karl, Osiris is definitely worth considering - there is always the risk of connection loss, and need to restart from a known checkpoint, the buffer could come in handy. Would it be able to make use of multiple TCP connections? A+ Dave