Re: [Erlang Forums] [Erlang/OTP Proposals/Proposals: RFC] Re-visiting EEP-0055

Nicolas Martyanoff <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:31:53 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
=D0=A0.=D0=A1. =D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=B2 <[email protected]> write=
s:

> 25.04.2022 11:42, Nicolas Martyanoff =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
>> And the list could go on for pages, without having to destroy the basic
>> concepts of the language.
>
> Somehow my (sad) feeling is the idea is exactly in destroying the Erlang =
as we
> know it. "No matter how hard we try, we cannot make Elixir more preferabl=
e --
> at least let us make Erlang *less* preferable."

I would not go that far. I have no information suggesting that Ericsson
is interested in Elixir in any way.

And I am almost convinced they do not care about Erlang anymore. These
new shiny 5G platforms are not written in Erlang (if I am wrong, please
convince Ericsson to release the required HTTP2 and JSON
implementations).

--=20
Nicolas Martyanoff
http://snowsyn.net
[email protected]