Re: [Erlang Forums] [Erlang/OTP Proposals/Proposals: RFC] Re-visiting EEP-0055

--000000000000f89bd905dd7bcf8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One question - why? Just because we can?
Erlang is doomed, Sorry Joe, we f**d things up.

=D0=BF=D0=BD, 25 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80. 2022 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 16:42, Lo=C3=AFc H=
oguin <[email protected]>:

> I do not see what has changed in the EEP to warrant taking another look
> at it. In particular, it still is a specialized use case of annotations
> which I would be fine adding to the language as long as they're
> generalized.
>
>

--000000000000f89bd905dd7bcf8a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>One question - why? Just because we can?</div><div>Er=
lang is doomed, Sorry Joe, we f**d things up.</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">=D0=BF=D0=BD, 25 =D0=B0=D0=BF=
=D1=80. 2022 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 16:42, Lo=C3=AFc Hoguin &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:e=
[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I do not see what has changed in the EEP t=
o warrant taking another look <br>
at it. In particular, it still is a specialized use case of annotations <br=
>
which I would be fine adding to the language as long as they&#39;re general=
ized.<br><br>
</blockquote></div></div>

--000000000000f89bd905dd7bcf8a--