Re: Add lists:init/1 - got tired of implementing it

Hans Svensson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Hello Hans,
> I've got some feedback on your patch after review:
> We have decided to reject this patch as we don't see a general need for
> the new function.
>
> Thanks for showing interest in contributing!
>
> --
>
> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
> Erlang OTP Team
>

That is sad news, and we find it a bit strange since *you* (as in the 
OTP team) yourself seems use this particular function/pattern quite 
frequently. We did a quick search through the OTP code base and found 
quite a few places where this particular function is either implemented 
recursively and used, or just uses reverse(tl(reverse(List)))). Also 
interesting to see is the different names used: first, butlast, but_last 
and remove_last_element.

Code implementing the "init"-function:
compiler
   v3_core:first/1
   v3_kernel:first/1
dialyzer
   dialyzer_contracts:but_last/1
   dialyzer_gui:butlast/1
hipe
   hipe_icode_type:butlast/1
orber
   orber_interceptors:remove_last_element/1

Direct uses of reverse(tl(reverse(L))):
sasl
   in systools_make:smart_guess/3
wx_gen
   in wx_gen:erl_skip_opt2/4
ssh
   in ssh_sftpd

Any further comments on this, it is really not a "new" function it is a 
missing function ;-)

Cheers,

Hans
_______________________________________________
erlang-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.