Re: Add lists:find/2,3

A more generic version would be to return the first result of applying the
fun to an element that does not return false. That way you can choose
whether to return the actual element, the result of the computation you
just or even something completely different. The user is also free to wrap
the result in case he/she is worried that the return value might be `false`.

Example implementation:

*find(_MatchF, []) ->*

*  false;*




*find(MatchF, [X|Xs]) ->  case MatchF(X) of    false -> find(MatchF,
Xs);    Val   -> Val  end.*

Thomas


2013/10/22 Anthony Ramine <[email protected]>

> Forwarding to list.
>
> --
> Anthony Ramine
>
> Le 22 oct. 2013 à 11:56, Anthony Ramine <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > Maybe we could just have dropuntil(F, L) -> dropwhile(fun (X) -> not
> F(X) end, L).
> >
> > Of course, the function would be written less naively to avoid
> constructing a new fun.
> >
> > --
> > Anthony Ramine
> >
> > Le 14 oct. 2013 à 15:52, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> >> #1: Would tagging the return value address like Masklinn mentions
> address your concern? {ok, Term} | error (instead of a default value)?
> >>
> >> #2: Also, I considered dropwhile but it involves introducing another
> fun, whereas the version I wrote is direct.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Anthony Ramine <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Hello Sean,
> >>
> >> I don't like this patch.
> >>
> >> 1/ You can't know whether an element was found or not if the list
> elements are arbitrary terms.
> >> 2/ I don't see why you would say people hack either foreach/2 or
> foldl/3 to do that when they should just use dropwhile/2.
> >>
> >> A naive implementation of find/2 using dropwhile/2:
> >>
> >> find(F, L) ->
> >>        case dropwhile(fun (E) -> not F(E) end, L) of
> >>                [] -> undefined;
> >>                [E|_] -> E
> >>        end.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Anthony Ramine
> >>
> >> Le 14 oct. 2013 à 02:44, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >>
> >>> `lists:find/2,3` returns the first element of the passed list for
> which the predicate fun returns `true`. If no elements result in the
> predicate being true, `undefined` (/2) or the given default value (/3) is
> returned.
> >>>
> >>> ## Why this new feature?
> >>>
> >>> A common task is to select the first element from a list that matches
> a condition, but there is no existing lists function or language feature
> that avoids traversing the entire list, while still returning a "safe"
> value. `lists:find/2,3` codifies the pattern of a tail-recursive search for
> the matching item without resorting to exceptions (used to abort
> `foreach/2` or `foldl/3`) and always returns either the first matching
> item, or an otherwise safe value.
> >>>
> >>> ## Risks / uncertain artifacts
> >>>
> >>> It is unclear the desired order of arguments for the 3-arity version.
> I have made the default value the final argument which is consistent with
> `application:get_env/3` and `proplists:get_value/3`, but most functions in
> lists place the `List` argument last.
> >>>
> >>> ## How did you solve it?
> >>>
> >>> Following the patterns of other functions in the lists module,
> `lists:find/3` tests the predicate function against the head of the list,
> returning the head if the predicate passes, or recursing over the tail if
> it does not.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/102
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sean Cribbs <[email protected]>
> >>> Software Engineer
> >>> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> >>> http://basho.com/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> erlang-patches mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean Cribbs <[email protected]>
> >> Software Engineer
> >> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> >> http://basho.com/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-patches mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
>

_______________________________________________
erlang-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches