Re: compile: asm and core options
Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOvwQ4gMsve8X0u9fcZ2cVNO8ZJ3DhTkg=G+OaLMNOPG2JUm_A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Anthony Ramine <[email protected]> wrote: > I would rather document 'from_asm' and 'from_core' than add ‘core’, > we already have ‘to_asm’ and ‘to_core’. We already have 'asm' (mapping to 'from_asm') implemented and documented as an option for compile:file/2. Therefore, I added 'core'. I think this makes more sense given the existing docs and implementation. > Le 4 déc. 2013 à 08:44, Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Implement the suggestions I made in >> http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2013-August/075161.html: >> >> * compile(3): stop declaring 'asm' as "for internal debugging use" >> * compile:file/2: implement 'core' option >> * compile_SUITE: test 'asm' >> >> https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/154 >> https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/154.patch >> git fetch git://github.com/tuncer/otp.git asm-core _______________________________________________ erlang-patches mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches