Re: compile: asm and core options
Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOvwQ4hMNTO+JqaU7DF4eAahe45ZgdJ9mBRZoyM3p2y2irRr6w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Anthony Ramine <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would rather document 'from_asm' and 'from_core' than add ‘core’, >> we already have ‘to_asm’ and ‘to_core’. > > We already have 'asm' (mapping to 'from_asm') implemented and > documented as an option for compile:file/2. Therefore, I added 'core'. > I think this makes more sense given the existing docs and > implementation. Anthony, after some pondering, I agree that it's important to document 'from_asm' and 'from_core'. But, we need to do both - add 'core' and document 'from_asm' and 'from_core'. If this gets accepted, it will be safe to rely on the options. The branch has been updated accordingly. _______________________________________________ erlang-patches mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches