Re: compile: asm and core options
Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:08:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOvwQ4gRXdbu9TFVdAE8NdRMsNknqHOEkoQ8mfJ3x6xXp1bO6w@mail.gmail.com> |
On 12/13/13, Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > >> On 12/10/13, Henrik Nord wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > Sending this for review but: squash the commits or make 2, one >> > for core and one for asm , and write a proper commit message. >> >> Done, please re-fetch. >> >> > I and Björn-Egil discussed the options. We see no reason to have two > names for the same option. So we suggest: I agree. > Remove the documentation for 'asm' and 'core', but retain the > implementation for 'asm' and 'core'. So, you're suggesting to * _only_ document 'from_asm' and 'from_core' and un-document 'asm' * implement 'core' -> 'from_core' mapping Is that correct? Wouldn't it make more sense to _not_ implement 'core' and deprecate 'asm'? _______________________________________________ erlang-patches mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches