Re: [erlang-patches] Proposal: reinstate pre-built PLT for Dialyzer
Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:19:39 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general,gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHsw=e278EwXQta89gpuAsg4ejku8M7MhbyX0ur1XEH9Uo8JWg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, assuming this gets off the ground, would you suggest distributing > the PLT with the tarball or in the git tree? I think the src tarball > and maybe a separate tarball make more sense. For reference, my local > R16B03 PLT is 4MB. This would also be in line with other generated > files like configure scripts (what's generated vs what's edited). In > the git tree it would only make sense to be included in a tagged tree, > but that may be confusing, so release tarballs make the most sense to > me. > Neither. If you build OTP from source, it would be built during the normal build/install process. If you download a prebuilt binary package (Windows or something from ESL or a distribution maintainer), the PLT should be included in that package. -- Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> Software Engineer Basho Technologies, Inc. http://basho.com/