Re: Improving ETS performances
Francesco Lattanzio <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:42:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Organization | A-Tono S.r.l., Pontedera (PI), Italy |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Removed dots from commit messages. A new pull request has been submitted. Here is the new patch: git fetch https://github.com/fltt/otp.git ets_nested_lht_4 https://github.com/fltt/otp/compare/erlang:maint...ets_nested_lht_4 https://github.com/fltt/otp/compare/erlang:maint...ets_nested_lht_4.patch -- Francesco Lattanzio On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Francesco Lattanzio wrote: > Hello again Sverker, > I've made some progress with this patch. Briefly: > > * set tables and bag/duplicate_bag tables are now managed by dedicated > code -- erl_db_hash.[ch] and erl_db_nested_hash.[ch] respectively > * reduced memory overhead > > You can compute the difference (in words) between the new and the old > implementations' memory footprints (when nested LHT is not active) of a > collection of 'n' objects sharing the same key as: > > MemDiff = 4 - n > > I used this formula to fix the ets suite's memory test case. > > With regard to the yielding problem, I deciced not to fix it now for the > following reasons: > > 1) it is unrelated to the nested LHT, as the problem manifests itself > even in the current (non-nested LHT) implementation > 2) you offered to fix it yourself > > The patch is available at: > > git fetch https://github.com/fltt/otp.git ets_nested_lht_3 > > https://github.com/fltt/otp/compare/erlang:maint...ets_nested_lht_3 > https://github.com/fltt/otp/compare/erlang:maint...ets_nested_lht_3.patch > > It is based on the maint branch. > > I've tested it on Linux x86_64, latest kernel (all the test suites) and > FreeBSD/i386 9.2 (only the emulator, kernel and stdlib test suites). > > Have another nice day. _______________________________________________ erlang-patches mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches