Re: DTLS patch
Max Lapshin <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:48:26 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMxVRxDVENfh00YyfS73MedNYh7_1UWJ4OzVQ=SKRqRRsgUnMA@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============0141400821255025784== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0435c01295e3f9051a98e71c --f46d0435c01295e3f9051a98e71c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't know exactly what to do with DTLS in my case, because I need to use the same udp socket for different kinds of communication. So I need to change protocol handler on socket. Right now I'm thinking about reimplementing DTLS by my hands and this idea is scarying me a lot. --f46d0435c01295e3f9051a98e71c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I don't know exactly what t= o do with DTLS in my case, because I need to use the same udp socket for di= fferent kinds of communication.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><= div class=3D"gmail_extra">So I need to change protocol handler on socket.</= div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Right n= ow I'm thinking about reimplementing DTLS by my hands and this idea is = scarying =C2=A0me a lot.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div> --f46d0435c01295e3f9051a98e71c-- --===============0141400821255025784== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ erlang-patches mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches --===============0141400821255025784==--