Re: A very good read: "Forth Enthusiasts are not all the same."
Nick Maroudas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting [email protected]: > Of course I am going to have reread it several times > and inquire further > elsewhere before I can begin to understand what is > really being said. > > Thank you Mr. Fox. > > http://www.ultratechnology.com/blog.htm > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick here: Always good to hear from Jeff. Re his blog (above) I agree 100%. As scientist or hobbyist, I have been in the fortunate position to take months or years if necessary, and learn only enough Forth to solve one real problem (math modelling or hardware i/o) at a time. CF has delivered what I wanted, to near the limits of my 500MHz Pentium PC, and I am looking forward to using SeaForth chips when these come on the market. Meanwhile, may I ask Jeff (quoting above blog): Jeff says: 90% of my colorforth is simple, SEAforth code. Sound input? Great I have drivers. Sound output? Great I have drivers. Nick asks: Would you mind posting those SEAforth drivers sometime (if this is not too much to ask of a very busy man) for the benefit of CF users? I have read the Intel manuals on High Definition sound for Integrated Audio (as found on modern Pentium motherboards) and have been assured that there are no hidden initiation codes - so the SEAforth code might be a useful supplement to help me (or someone more knowledgable) to implement CF code for PC motherboard audio. Caritas, Nick