Re: A very good read: "Forth Enthusiasts are not all the same."

Nick Maroudas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting [email protected]:

> Of course I am going to have reread it several times
> and inquire further
> elsewhere before I can begin to understand what is
> really being said.
> 
> Thank you Mr. Fox.
> 
> http://www.ultratechnology.com/blog.htm
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Nick here:  Always good to hear from Jeff. Re his blog
(above) I agree 100%.  As scientist or hobbyist, I have
been in the fortunate position to take months or years
if necessary, and learn only enough Forth to solve one
real problem (math modelling or hardware i/o) at a
time. 
CF has delivered what I wanted, to near the limits of
my
500MHz Pentium PC, and I am looking forward to using
SeaForth chips when these come on the market. 

Meanwhile, may I ask Jeff (quoting above blog):

Jeff says:  90% of my colorforth is simple, SEAforth
code.
Sound input? Great I have drivers.
Sound output? Great I have drivers.

Nick asks:  Would you mind posting those SEAforth
drivers sometime (if this is not too much to ask of a
very busy man) for the benefit of CF users?  I have
read the Intel manuals on High Definition sound for
Integrated Audio (as found on modern Pentium
motherboards) and have been assured that there are no
hidden initiation codes - so the SEAforth code might be
a useful supplement to help me (or someone more
knowledgable) to implement CF code for PC motherboard
audio.  

Caritas,

Nick
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.