Re: Hello - and where to begin?

"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ray St. Marie wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 5:57 PM, Gwenhwyfaer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 20/01/2008, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The OLPC project was really very firm on keeping the number of
>>> programming languages to a bare minimum, namely Python, Squeak Smalltalk
>>> and Open Firmware Forth. Of course with Mitch Bradley representing Forth
>>> and Alan Kay representing Smalltalk both senior members of the OLPC
>>> team, I wouldn't expect anything else. But if you have the "Linux port"
>>> of the Open Firmware Forth on the machine already, and can install
>>> gForth out of the Fedora repositories, is there a place for colorforth?
>> Wouldn't Open Firmware be in the OLPC at the very lowest level, before
>> Linux has even had a chance to wake itself up? In which case, the OLPC
>> is arguably already a dedicated Forth box, from the second one
>> switches it on...
> 
> You don't get ring 0 access with out a special ( easy to obtain but
> one would have to enter a special)  key.
> 
> This is obviously to protect the 'mother' OS and the machine.
> colorForth boot process may have to handle that situation.
>> - I was going to say Xcolorforth, but it looks as though Mark
>> Slicker's website has gone away; anyone still have a copy? (hmm. Isn't
>> this where we came in...?)
>>
> 
> http://colorforthray.info/XcolorForth.tar.gz
> 
> Smiles. :)
> 

Well ... I got it ... and GLColorForth. But neither one compiles. The 
"as" assembler is choking on the "push", "pop" and "call" op codes. So 
... off to Google. ;(
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.