Re: objects and forth

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:40:21PM -0800, tom arnall wrote:
>
> what's the forth community thinking about objects these days?

There are quite some implementations. I have a very
simple one (a generalisation of DOES>) and are happy with it.
For instance. The problem of eulerproject.net has a couple of
thousand cuboids. Those have 3 start point and 3 sizes.
It is hard if not impossible to make a reasonable program
without structures of some sort, classes, objects, whatever.


Groetjes Albert.

P.S. I'm currently one of 3 Forthers who have solved more
100 of the 229 problems on the euler project.
There is a colorforther, but he has solved 2 problems only.

--
Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst