Re: New Linux 4word

[email protected] (Albert van der Horst)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:45:53PM -0400, Mark Slicker wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Albert van der Horst wrote:
>
> >There is no attempt from Chucks side to systematically
> >develop colorforth such that it is portable.
>
> And you are arguing there should be? I'd much rather see Chuck designing
> chips then playing PC boot technician.
>
> >This is a job left to the reader. We have had little success
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In view of the underlined, I cannot understand how you could
conclude that I argue that Chuck should be.
I argue that it is our job.

So I conclude you are trying to be negative and argumentative.

<SNIP>
>
> >But IMO my assembler tips the balance.
> >
> ><SNIP>
>
> You snip the most important part of my message, I wonder if you even
> bothered to read it or understand it.

I always snip things I have nothing to comment on.

<SNIP>

> >Should an assembler  of the postit fixup principle
> >be accepted  for colorforth, that is a far cry from 'forcing'
> >upon. It would be a combination of reimplementing the postit-fixup
> >principle in colorforth and copying some of the tables
> >for the opcodes. Probably not those of the floating point.
> >Then the names must be revised, because it uses characters
> >not present in colorforth.
>
> You want acceptence before you have done any reimplementation, before you
> have done any revision, again this has nothing do with factoring. It has
> everything to do with forcing your own subjective view onto the colorForth
> community.

Thank you for the compliment. Forcing a view -- views are always
subjective -- onto a community is tantamount to trying to introduce an
new idea.
Do I want acceptance? The only bloody thing I want is someone tell
me which binary colorforth to work on, and I'll show you something.

Have you seen my:
    - version of colorforth assembler source where the
      Huffman codes are generated by macro's instead of calculated
      by hand
    - version of the retroforth source where the 1234 2, thingies
      are being replaced by assembler instructions?
      program that does that replacement?
    - have you bothered to look how someone gets an
      Pentium assembler in 13 screens?

>
> Mark

Groetjes Albert

--
Albert van der Horst,Oranjestr 8,3511 RA UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
[email protected] http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.