Re: Assembler or machinecode. Was Re: [colorforth] New Linux 4word

On 4/13/05, Ray St. Marie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/10/05, Chris Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Haha, very funny Ray :)
> 
> Thank you, I read it again and thought it came off as serious
> flippant. Glad the humor shown thru. I'm only ever hahaSerious.
> 
> > You know, I've written a lot of bootsectors and I'd be willing to
> > write one thats a bit less selective about the hardware, and is a
> > drop-in replacement for the colorforth one.(I've done the same for
> > RetroForth 8 Native)
> 
> Yes, I do know that you are brilliant, the reason i _know_ that i'm
> atleast 10 iQ points behind the group AND can't wait to read your
> code. :)

Why thank you for the wonderful compliment, Sir!

I talked to mark slicker and I want to ask a question. Would you
rather see an elaborate bootsector written in Forth, or a simple
bootsector which merely injects binary code that just enters protected
mode right away, then passing control to code that loads from the
disk, etc?

> Ray
> --
> Ray St. Marie
> Rastm2ATusersDOTsourceforgeDOTnet
> Ray.StMarieATgmailDOTcom and ATsbcglobalDOTnet
> Ray_stmarieAThotmailDOTcom
> Raystm2 and rastm2 in Internet Relay Chat (irc)
> /connect  irc.freenode.net Busness discussion: /join #biz
> ColorForth: /join #c4th #c4th-ot Forth: /join #retro #forth #concatenative
> Programming: /join #python #lisp #scheme #asm
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
> 
> 


-- 
Chris Walton
arke on irc.freenode.net