Re: Assembler or machinecode. Was Re: [colorforth] New Linux 4word

Theres several BIOS bugs where registers and segments arent the way
they're supposed to. I don't know if this is an issue, but its one
thing to keep a lookout for. Another might be to use the BIOS in
general a bit more extensively, even though its easier not to use it
quite often.

The bootsector I wrote for retroforth will boot on pretty much any 386
PC, I believe, as long as the floppy drive works.

On 4/14/05, Dr Nick Maroudas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/13/05, John R. Strohm <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'll go for the simple boot sector.  And if you can throw in pointers to
> documentation on how to do a boot sector, and how to deal with modern hard
> drives at the lowest level, I'd be interested in that as well.
> 
> [to which ] Chris Walton wrote:
> 
> >nondot.org/~sabre
> >look for the os development articles, theres lots there
> >
> >
> >
> Nick here:
> 
> Thanks for the website; it helped me understand the boot segment of cf.asm
> but it doesn't explain why that simple boot sector has failed so many
> newbies.
> No longer my problem (having found the right dodge by trial and error,
> for Win95 on my Asus P2) but would be interested to learn:  How would
> you change the code to load in more cases?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Nick
> 
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
> 
> 


-- 
Chris Walton
arke on irc.freenode.net