Re: bug in bit32?
[email protected] (Albert van der Horst)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:54:26PM -0400, Mark Slicker wrote: > Here is bit16 and bit32 from ftp://ftp.ultratechnology.com/GEN.ASM: <SNIP> > Notice above by the lablel 'b32', 'shl EAX, 1'. I think this should be > 'shl AX, 1' like in 'bit16'. I think bit32 apears to work because the > previous row in the bitmap will be shifted into the upper 16 bits of EAX, > and will be displayed on the next call to bit32. As far as I understand it, this keeping of 16 bits for the next call of bit32 is intended. Why would you call it bit32 if it only handles 16 bits? It does handle 32 bits, in two calls. <SNIP> Groetjes Albert -- Albert van der Horst,Oranjestr 8,3511 RA UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters. [email protected] http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst