Re: new color
[email protected] (Albert van der Horst)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.colorforth |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:18:35AM -0700, John Drake wrote: > I'm a bit confused by the proposal. Are you > looking to do the same as the tick word is > traditional Forth? > > ' foo ( put the address of foo on the stack). > > If so, then wouldn't re-introducing tick to > ColorForth be easier than introducing a new > color? (Not sure what goes on to adding > colors frankly.) I would be all in favor of a color over tick. This is based on the confusion between ' and ['] etc in ANSI Forth. I personally view 'DROP as a unity and have changed my Forth to accommodate 'DROP instead of ' DROP. This is the next best thing to colors that you can do. Groetjes Albert -- Albert van der Horst,Oranjestr 8,3511 RA UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters. [email protected] http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst