Re: Chuck 2005-11-05 source, anyone?

Cor! Following the link on your site for the 8051 led me astray...  
Ahh, memories :) Still prefer the Z80 :P
I've been out of the embedded loop for a while now, good to see  
they're getting better and better.

Aaaanyway: This is a PPC version? I'd be very interested!

Cheers,

Luis.


On 10 Mar 2006, at 22:12, [email protected] wrote:

> I've been somewhat curious what changes were made in the kernel in the
> new colorforth, although I'm not a colorforther (I don't even own  
> an x86
> box).  But I did some searching, and AFAICT no one has disassembled it
> back to source yet (I'll never understand you people).
>
> And...I was bored today, so I started doing it myself.  I now have a
> rough draft of the (nasm) source code for it.  Some of the data (the
> huffman-encoded names,  for instance) I didn't bother putting in  
> source
> form.  And there are a couple of the new addresses and routines for
> which I haven't invented names.
>
> I have what I wanted out of it, but it seems like it might be  
> useful to
> the colorforth community.  If there is interest, I'll consider  
> finishing
> it up to the point where it assembles correctly...
>
> Anyone?
>
> --Josh
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
>
>