Re: GForth-EC isn't functional
Bernd Paysan <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:59:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.gforth |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <22480107.myq1RfAKXn@liubei> |
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2021, 22:55:36 CET schrieb Joel Rees: > I don't think 6502 or 8086 is going to work at all. > > Others with a large enough address space need a working gforth to build in > the normal build process, if I recall correctly.. You need to build the normal gforth first (and not in a separate build directory), and then run ./build-ec <target> there. 6502 fails, but the other three (r8c, 8086 and MISC) build. I didn't check if they build correctly (after replacing THIRD in kernel-ec/saccepft.fs with 2 PICK). Actually, it is probably better to use the gforth-0.7.3 to build Gforth-EC, as no development has been done for Gforth-EC, and we tried to separate the Gforth-EC kernel, but haven't tested if we did succeed other than “it compiles”. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ* https://net2o.de/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEERJ1NDqPQRwYnwBjr9y2Uk5MtoGcFAmHLlu4ACgkQ9y2Uk5Mt oGfFWQ/8CEyJVHDlw+n0rSw4vpYxAkys+uF918gompwlO2oC3PWiMQ8ZPMy5rMRo 4Mp8bBIJxSXPj/ZdNRV/ONlgFTr7uFi2Oyp/mBbMxCo3EXOjfXBchtoBl2vEhv8J caPuUPkz17NeMskpnu0VMDhOZBqjLLmUx7aZx7fJhntg/8zHhPH4OCs26VjD/9pX EdTK6infI3RBTBXsVrtZuXqMuHss83do9zV3Hr+Yz4r90oDQZIF7BfIrr/zmUzKH cUvwWhYSGG4XCxOv4CshJ5eW98dPp0cZUzXqHKXWWcySXv9QwoEHoFzbxxrSy5Nr k2m2CfQVjeIHb6kjcEejXLVoi0guJzWZIN/pS9gEaIdyffot8VDe/0JcsQlVW5Vw wHBl2weTQrHGcW1bE1arVkbsfiYgbp4yL1hBgxxOqM/1Q82f3inC7JB0sdzoCKB6 L+diMKH/o8cGlK4KSL5e8Rmhj/WpIt10O642sOeDc3ghvszQBo1gye8WsXnkxvYx PB6n7T09IW7bA3fovmsgWAww02YQ5JOuVA4YfDHDpBumrzKdffIbCHJM0yVUu548 jVw4a7+YNgRW7/K7QmL8T9KgW4P1yfhFHdFijyL5uzluoFhhCltWVNqZ9um0Iopi KqQRP8V/nwQjeXDIE9gPvCi784xh+L1rJPkyuk95lAo6mAqi71c= =OSx2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----