Re: -infinity and REPRESENT

Bernd Paysan <[email protected]> Mon, 04 May 2020 21:53:59 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.forth.gforth
Message-ID <16381941.F3y2CZnWt1@daiyu>
Am Montag, 4. Mai 2020, 20:54:17 CEST schrieb [email protected]:
> On 2020-05-04 17:24, Anton Ertl wrote:
> > I just re-implemented REPRESENT.
> > 
> > One issue is how to deal with -infinity (e.g., the result of -1e 0e
> > f/).
> > Previously Gforth 0.7.2+glibc produced "-inf" and f1=0 (positive),
> > f2=0 (not valid); other libc implementations might lead to different
> > results.
> 
> Sorry, what are f1 and f2?

flag1 is sign (-1 when negative), flag2 is valid (0 when invalid).

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ*
https://net2o.de/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ByS8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----