Re: Re: Feature Requests - longer view
David McNab <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:55:09 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.picforth |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > If there's a structure so that the knowledge if various contributors > can be accumulated, there will be progress. There is such a structure. Bookmark this: http://wiki.enst.fr/bin/view/Picforth/WebHome (that site is down at the moment - not getting DNS reply - but it should hopefully be back up soon) > So eg. someone(s) could list words to the glossary, and other(s) could > fill in the 'answers'. I.e. successive refinement. The task is never done, > but can be useful from an early stage. > PS. I'd like to revive my project which went dormant when: > 1. DOSEMU wouldn't drive par-port for my programmer, Consider switching to WINE - I use ICPROG under WINE for burning bootloader code into my PIC (after which I just use a linux bootloading client each time I compile a PicForth prog) > 2. I didn't get satisfactory feed back of how to use arrays. Creating an array: create arrayname $16 allot \ creates 16-byte read/write array arrayname 2 + @ \ fetches element 2 $45 arrayname 2 + ! \ stores 0x45 into arrayname[2] > Have we got a 'GROWING' examples-code-base ? > Where I could see examples of array usage ? If you only want read-only tables, in RAM, EEPROM or program flash, refer section 5.14 of the manual. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PicForth mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rfc1149.net/mailman/listinfo/picforth > > -- Cheers David