Re: Re: More <0 strangeness

Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>>>>>>"Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]> writes:
> Sam> Ok, I fixed this one in my repository. Could you please give it a
> Sam> try?  The problem was that the compiler incorrectly assumed that
> Sam> "movwf" was setting the Z status bit, as "movf" does
> And incidentally, this has likely fixed the "dup 0<" as well, as "0<"
> is implemented like "$80 and 0<>". I will make a release with this
> fix.

Yep, it has fixed both 0< and 0<> :)

-- 
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer