Re: Re: problem with priotasker.fs

Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> I must admit that I don't use priotasker.fs myself. I wrote it a long
> time ago but was not satisfied with it, I think I should even have
> removed it from the distribution.

Sorry to hear that.

priotasker is a nice concept, and I was looking at using it in my 
development code. No problem though, I'll cook up another threading scheme.

-- 
Cheers
David