Re: -! optimisation problem
Samuel Tardieu <[email protected]> 06 Dec 2004 17:46:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.forth.picforth |
|---|---|
| Organization | Avian Carrier & Friends |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "David" == David McNab <[email protected]> writes: David> With the former, the 24-bit division code was failing. With the David> latter, it succeeds. Which makes me happy, because lib3 is now David> pure picforth, with not a single ']asm' cop-out. Great! When you upload your new version on the wiki, I'll be happy to add it either in PicForth or as a test case, to make sure that there are no regressions. When I wrote that the two operations were equivalent, I was not talking about the status bits whose behaviour are not covered by Forth :-) Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- [email protected] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam