PicForth: updated IC16Fxxx -> PIC18F*

>>>>> "Chris" == easlab  <[email protected]> writes:

Chris> But from what I remember of picforth: - it hasn't kept up with
Chris> the new pic chips, but since by it's nature forth is very
Chris> 'open', you can modify/evolve it yourself;

  Sam wrote:
> Moreover, I don't use PIC16Fxxx anymore :) I use PIC18F*, for which I
> have written the rforth1 compiler (http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/rforth1).
> 

Ok I'll look at  -/devel/rforth1, because your desgns were well structured;
but I've lost enthusiasm for pic.

Because the whole original minimal design has been abandoned.
It's like taking a 2CV and adding electric windows and air bags.

IMO the pic architechture is not scaleable, and it's absurd to try
multitasking ...etc. as if it was eg. an ARM.

Perhaps the dspVersion is interesting ?
Perhaps for eg. cheap mp3 players ?
I don't know enough.

Thanks for picforth.


== Chris Glur.