Re: case sensitivity

Prefixing sounds good to me.  SWIG has a special event just for
constants, so the hack to make the generated Goo name have a $ in
front is trivial.

Hopefully the pathological cases you mention would never come up, but
in such a case, perhaps the older versions are deprecated and
therefore not included as part of the interface exposed to Goo?

Andrew

Rob Myers <[email protected]> writes:

> On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 11:37 PM, Jonathan Bachrach wrote:
> 
> > anybody else have opinions on this?
> 
> Can't Goo just prefix constants with $? That would solve the problem
> of C library writers using different capitalization schemes as
> different namespaces for functions and constants.
> 
> There's a related problem this doesn't fix. As examples: in the MacOS
> "Carbon" libraries, there are a couple of macros which use different
> capitalizations to denote different versions. And the old "Toolbox"
> code had different capitalizations of the same names to denote
> by-value and by-reference versions of methods that worked on structs.
> 
> This is bad practice, though, as it's confusing and introduces
> potential for errors. IMVHO, whatever  is decided, bad practice from
> thirty-year-old programming languages is a problem for wrapper
> generators rather than new programming languages.
> 
> - Rob.