Whither Dylan?

--=-OFFQeh/+4+tahzRlh49B
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So I must admit I'm curious why people so obviously familiar with and
supportive of Dylan would develop a new langauge very much like Dylan
but revert to S-Expr syntax.  Anyone care to comment?  I'm aware of the
main advantages of S-Expr syntax, but I thought that the argument for
Dylan was that its macro system allowed the most common and useful
applications of Lisp macros without requiring such a controversial
syntax.

How do you see Goo vis-a-vis Dylan?  Do you see it as a competitor to
Dylan or more of a complement?

--=20
Miles Egan <[email protected]>

--=-OFFQeh/+4+tahzRlh49B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+nr99U4Jq/wH1PVERAsRoAJ9Pp52Tbvdp0L/zF65KqwJPmLHVlACg3pxJ
LHAjeEPvIte69P/akvMoil0=
=PC75
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OFFQeh/+4+tahzRlh49B--