Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 4.0.30

Carl Marcum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.groovy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi All,

+1

I'm using MacOS Tahoe on M2 Chip...

For the source I checked:
* sha256 checksum
* valid signature
* NOTICE and LICENSE files present.
* Opened as project in IntelliJ 2025.2
* checked licenses with: gradlew rat
* built from source and ran tests.

For the 3 distribution zip files I checked:
* sha256 checksum
* valid signature

With the binary distribution I tested groovyConsole and ran some scripts.

Best regards,
Carl

On 1/16/26 1:39 AM, Paul King wrote:
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 4.0.30 release!
>
> This release includes 13 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12356341
>
> Tag:https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_4_0_30
> Tag commit id: dacc95057ca87d4fffcf7e3141236ba38100935e
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r81933).
> Source release:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.30/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.30/distribution
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 4.0.30.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 4.0.30
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 4.0.30 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.