Re: [RESULT][VOTE] remove/archive the geb-dev mailing list

Does infra need to be told what to do with the notifications from Github like Issues and PR's?

Should they come here with a prefix like [GEB-I] and [GEB-PR]?

Best regards,
Carl

On 1/19/26 4:51 AM, Paul King wrote:

> Issue created:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-27578
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 5:50 PM Paul King<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I was busy again, so apologies for the slightly longer than normal vote window.
>> This vote has passed with THREE +1 PMC votes, TWO additional +1 votes,
>> and no other votes.
>> I'll chat with admin about closing and/or archiving that list.
>>
>> Cheers, Paul.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 8:42 PM Paul King<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I promised a VOTE thread but got busy. Here is the VOTE thread as
>>> promised to the following DISCUSS thread:
>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/27gz3m7xdpslo54q0tf6gdvdm2n3z198
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>
>>> When we created the Geb subproject, I went ahead and created what I
>>> thought were the normal mailing lists including geb-users and geb-dev.
>>> I have since refreshed my memory on what is recommended for
>>> subprojects and having a separate geb-dev list is not recommended
>>> within the ASF. Formal votes need to happen anyway on the Groovy dev
>>> (or in rare cases private) list, and in the past some projects with
>>> such lists suffered from fragmentation. The geb-dev traffic has been
>>> super low, so I was going to ask infra to delete or archive it
>>> (whatever they would normally do in such cases). I suggest we keep the
>>> geb-users list for now.
>>>
>>> The folks most involved in Geb have already suggested that geb-dev
>>> isn't really needed. Instead of using the geb-dev list, we'd just use
>>> the dev list and use a prefix such as [Geb] if the context isn't super
>>> obvious.
>>>
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Remove the list
>>> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
>>> [ ] -1 Keep the list, because...
>>>
>>> Here is my vote: +1
>>>
>>> Cheers, Paul.