Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 5.1.0

+1 (binding)

*Guillaume Laforge*
Apache Groovy committer
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud <https://cloud.google.com/>

   - Blog: glaforge.dev
   - X: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge>
   - Bluesky: @glaforge.dev <https://bsky.app/profile/glaforge.dev>
   - Mastodon: @[email protected] <http://%[email protected]/>


Le mer. 12 août 2026, 06:19, Paul King <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 5.1.0 release!
> This is essentially the continuation of the 5.0.X stream but with some
> minor breaking changes we wouldn't normally do in a patch release.
>
> This release includes 11 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the
> changelog:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12357368
>
> Tag:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_5_1_0
> Tag commit id: ea84f00745d0636d1fdd8da3b53ba2e7439d6b1a
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r86728).
> Source release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/5.1.0/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/5.1.0/distribution
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegroovy-1117
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 5.1.0.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with
> sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 5.1.0
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 5.1.0 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>