Re: Static typing question
Agile Developer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKmU=T_FhS2frnpywavLCKLnTqbNXyw9HdjEG7bi+K5i5VX+qg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, Edmond can you give me a case not covered by a typed language? I'm really curious, because the more I think the more I see modern PL practice/research has uncovered typed language strengths. These days, typed languages solve more and more issues traditionally solved with dynamic languages. On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 8:50 PM Edmond Kemokai <[email protected]> wrote: > From the perspective of someone building products that leverage the > dynamic language features, the answers is a resounding YES, plenty of > reason to keep dual type support (both dynamic and static). > > > -- Dr. Vasileios Anagnostopoulos (MSc,PhD) Researcher/Developer