On 16.03.24 23:57, John Creighton wrote:
> In the summary part of bing's answer, bing actually said
> that "->" has the highest order of precedence but if you read the whole
> answer you see it is only for type construction where Bing
> specifically made claims of the order of precedence and in the other
> case (parsing & fixity), bing said that the fixity of "->" is not
> defined in the Haskell 98 report, and nuanced it by saying that the
> parsing rules depend on both fixity and associativity.
The thing with GPT AIs like what's currently hyped is that it's
essentially just piecing together sentences on the basis of "in all the
training data, what was the most likely follow-up word". IN particular,
they do not follow any reasoning or do any semantic analysis whatsoever.
This is great for writing speeches.
It's also great for boilerplate code.
It's bad for accuracy. It essentially depends on the quality of the
training data, and since these GPT bots need humongous amounts of
training, that's typically "just the Internet". (The companies behind
these bots try to filter out nonsense, with a focus on avoiding public
outcry, which tends to create even more humorous results.)
Regards,
Jo
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.