Re: [Call for Participation]: Haskell Certification Program

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 25.06.24 13:25, Noon van der Silk wrote:
>  > It's a minimal foundation that employers can assume so they don't have
>  > to check that themselves, they can concentrate on other aspects, and
>  > it's a known stable foundation, minimal as it may be.
> 
> But I think this is the precise problem with it being supported by the HF.
> 
> I don't think it's a minimal foundation at all (almost regardless of 
> it's content).

Oh but it is.
It may be useless, there may be better options, there might be other 
issues with it.
But being able to acquire a certificate in a field IS a foundation.

> I think we've learned by now 
> <https://sordina.net/blog/2016/03/26/1458976158-Aesthetic-Isomorphism_and_Hiring_Juniors.html>, as a broad programming community, that there's a classical logical fallacy here - (some) "good" programmers can do well on these exams, but that /doesn't/ mean you *must* complete this well in order to be a "good" programmer. There's many issues here among them that "good programmer" is only defined respect to organisational context anyway.

While the linked article does have a point, it's just one way to look at 
hiring decisions or engineer performance, and others are just as useful 
and valid.
So, no, not a logical fallacy. Just a different perspective.

> I think it's completely fine and reasonable for a private company 
> (Serokell) to be offering this certification, especially one such as 
> them that has real experience in the Haskell ecosystem and plenty of 
> people contributing; but I think what would be a very bad situation is 
> that if the HF itself, and the broad Haskell (hiring) ecosystem got the 
> idea that this was something all candidates should seek achieve.

Nobody is claiming that, and it would be a very unexpected outcome.
In practice, a certificate gives you a modicum of street credibility if 
your CV does not document a background in the area.

Regards,
Jo

P.S.: I do see your point about independence, and agree that's a 
potential concern.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.