Re: Files and Modules
Brandon Allbery <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKFCL4VmcO6DKTeZ_hCOWDL5P3BhcGa6_k1v7Q3LKA4nCRqoMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 9:22 AM julian getcontented.com.au < [email protected]> wrote: > But to go back to what you were saying, if we had the ability to decouple > modules from files it would mean I could set up a notion of dependency > between the modules that I have stored in Texts in such a way that I > wouldn’t need to repeat code between the Texts when I want to share code as > I’m compiling chunks of it. At the moment I try hard to keep the set of > common items shared between all the code I have because it makes it simpler > to manage and keeps duplication low, and it also means the call to stack > that I have only has to include a small set of packages and can be common > between all the combined sets of code I have. > I wonder if an alternative would be a rope type with shareable strands. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh [email protected] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.