RE: patch applied (ghc): q

Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.all
Message-ID <DCA83D5F3861C941808187D4D3878750344BB2D1__48365.2220493697$1165007570$gmane$org@EA-EXMSG-C312.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
Sorry.  I mis-typed.  Then I tried to un-record the patch I had recorded.  Darcs crashed (log below).

Since I cannot un-record it, all I could do was to push it.

Sigh

Anyway, it's a small change fixing a bug in TcSimplify that mixed up implication constraints and implicit parameters; it fixes one of the two bugs reported in Trac #1033

Simon

| -----Original Message-----
| From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lemmih
| Sent: 01 December 2006 15:28
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: [email protected]
| Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): q
|
| On 12/1/06, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
| > Thu Nov 30 19:42:07 PST 2006  [email protected]
| >   * q
| >
| >     M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3
| >     M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -4 +1
|
| q?

sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord

Fri Dec  1 03:42:07 GMT Standard Time 2006  [email protected]
  * q
Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y


Wed Nov 29 22:52:43 GMT Standard Time 2006  [email protected]
  * Remove trace
Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d

darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra:
Fri Apr  7 11:18:39 GMT Standard Time 2006  Simon Marlow <[email protected]>
  * Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes
  We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that
  finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black
  hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test).
Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.