Re: patch applied (ghc): q

I'm switching to non-partial repositories for most of my GHC trees now.  This 
way I avoid the whole class of get_extra failures, which seem to be cropping up 
quite a lot these days.  To start, you can grab:

   http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-HEAD-20061109.tar.bz2

And then pull into that tree.  Doing 'darcs get' without --partial probably 
won't work on Windows because some of the patches interact badly with 
case-insensitive file systems.

Non-partial trees aren't so bad: you only need to download the whole thing once, 
then you can just copy it to make new trees.  Don't 'darcs get' on Windows, 
again due to the case-insensitivity problem, but definitely *do* 'darcs get' on 
Unix, because it'll share the patch files between the two trees.

Cheers,
	Simon

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Sorry.  I mis-typed.  Then I tried to un-record the patch I had recorded.  Darcs crashed (log below).
> 
> Since I cannot un-record it, all I could do was to push it.
> 
> Sigh
> 
> Anyway, it's a small change fixing a bug in TcSimplify that mixed up implication constraints and implicit parameters; it fixes one of the two bugs reported in Trac #1033
> 
> Simon
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lemmih
> | Sent: 01 December 2006 15:28
> | To: Simon Peyton-Jones
> | Cc: [email protected]
> | Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): q
> |
> | On 12/1/06, Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> | > Thu Nov 30 19:42:07 PST 2006  [email protected]
> | >   * q
> | >
> | >     M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3
> | >     M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -4 +1
> |
> | q?
> 
> sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord
> 
> Fri Dec  1 03:42:07 GMT Standard Time 2006  [email protected]
>   * q
> Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y
> 
> 
> Wed Nov 29 22:52:43 GMT Standard Time 2006  [email protected]
>   * Remove trace
> Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d
> 
> darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra:
> Fri Apr  7 11:18:39 GMT Standard Time 2006  Simon Marlow <[email protected]>
>   * Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes
>   We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that
>   finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black
>   hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test).
> Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?