Re: -pgmc/a/l default options, other ideas
Simon Marlow <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:46:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.all |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <45A24B4D.3010308__25144.2656074234$1168264041$gmane$org@microsoft.com> |
Neil Mitchell wrote: > >> A possible >> solution would be to modify Cabal work with CMake and let CMake do >> the translation to make/nmake/Visual Studio project files. > > > An alternative, but one that involves replacing one dependancy (Mingw) > with another (CMake). Admitedly its a smaller dependancy, but not a > good direction to go in. I must be missing something... why would you want to do this? The Mingw dependency would go away with the native Windows port anyway, in exchange for a dependency on the MS tools. >> The most aesthetic solution would be to build the capability >> right into Cabal but I simply don't have the time to take on yet >> another project like that right now. > > That is by far the best option, Cabal will definately need this at > some point. It would be a shame if you go to extra work for something > that will be done eventually. I presume you mean having Cabal generate the Makefile/nmake/VS project file. What do you see as the benefit from doing this? Cheers, Simon