Re: Proposal: New procedures for handling packages in a GHC tree
Gabor Greif <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.ghc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK-hX0=7B15Xy13cHZFA+kXsaW7ss1vwSXf_nbgJTyLnDE3hdg@mail.gmail.com> |
Will this work with the github mirror (https://github.com/ghc), as the
module names seem to be different from those on darcs.haskell.org?
Just a quick check before I destroy my local repo with a "./sync-all pull" :-)
Cheers,
Gabor
On 11/25/12, Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:10:04PM +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>>
>> We have been working on a new way in which we handle the repositories
>> that make up a GHC tree, in order to makes the process smoother for all
>> parties.
>>
>> Our proposal is here:
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/WorkingConventions/Repositories
>
> We've now gone ahead with this proposal.
>
> We've stuck with only converting repositories with upstreams to
> submodules for now, but we may expand them to cover all repositories in
> the future.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
>