Re: Hoopl vs LLVM?
Greg Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.glasgow.user,gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.ghc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLa5WMqcqqYRm1BD-f26LxiAFUt+tV8SWqPR=uA56_ZpJN8HQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you all for your replies. On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > And I think there is probably quite a lot that is in reach for C--, but > out of reach for LLVM. Why? Because before we pass the code to LLVM we do > CPS-conversion. Is there a case for making a C/C++ compiler target C-- instead of LLVM? Or does its optimizations cater more to functional programming or lazy evaluation? Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users