Re: cvs commit: fptools/green-card/distrib INSTALL
Sven Panne <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:51:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.green-card |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3F4C711E.3000000__28915.6907856979$1061974385@informatik.uni-muenchen.de> |
Simon Marlow wrote:
> I'd go for cvs add/remove.
OK, I'll do it then.
> I know of ways to do a rename which preserves the history *and*
> keeps the proper 'cvs -D' behaviour,
I don't even want to imagine what this would involve... :-}
> [...] (I hope one day we'll move from CVS to something better).
Just to be curious: What is it that you don't like about CVS? In my
last company we were quite happy with it, using it for a > 1mio LOC
project. The only downside is that there are no real transactions, but
once people get used to small commits (representing a single semantic
change, not e.g. a month's work), that's not a problem in practice.
Cheers,
S.