Re: ANN: H98 FFI Addendum 1.0, Release Candidate 13

> I wonder how this discrepancy between the libraries and the
> report arose. 

For what it's worth, the library has been that way since June 28, 2001:

http://cvs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/fptools/libraries/base/Foreign/
Storable.hs?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

http://cvs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/fptools/libraries/base/GHC/
Storable.lhs?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

This seems to be copied from Marcin's QForeign which had the same type from 
Jan 2, 2001 - March 18, 2001 (i.e., the entire lifetime of the library)

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/qforeign/qforeign/lib/
QStorable.hsc?rev=1.7&view=markup

> Did I simply make a mistake when writting the
> report (then, this would qualify as an error in the report
> anyway)?

On this evidence, it looks like it's an error in the report.

The type is certainly consistent with the type of plusPtr if you
think about implementing peekByteOff like this:

  peekByteOff p o = peek (plusPtr p o)

And, since peekByteOff is primarily for use when peekElemOff doesn't work 
(i.e., for structs), it makes sense to change the type.

--
Alastair Reid