Re: #16380: HPC's CLI is awkward
"GHC" <[email protected]> Sun, 03 Mar 2019 15:16:28 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
#16380: HPC's CLI is awkward
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: MaxGabriel | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Code Coverage | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bgamari):
Indeed HPC could use some love. It would be great if someone could offer
to look after it. It's just a standard (albeit a bit dated) Haskell
executable so anyone able to use GHC should be able pick it up without any
trouble.
Alternatively, I have long wondered whether GHC should even be in the
business of offering tools like `hpc` and `hp2ps`. I rather wonder whether
we might not be better off simply doing a better job of documenting the
formats and interfaces exposed by GHC and leave the tooling to be provided
by Hackage packages. In the case of `hp2ps`, this may already be the case:
I nearly always use `hp2pretty` instead of `hp2ps` and I suspect I'm not
the only one.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/16380#comment:1>