Re: Mission Statement + Widgets

Axel Simon wrote:

> That doesn't preclude writing a binding to backends not in the list. But 
> such an effort will not influence the spec anymore. So if there are people 
> out there who are willing to write backends for other platforms: now is 
> the time to add them to the report.

Put me down for Xt/Motif and Xt/Athena. What do I have to write, and
by when?

Also, section 1 mis-states my position:

	12 Glynn Clements Opinion:
[snip]
	Proposal:

	(a) use wxWindows since it uses the native platform and thus
	adheres to the native look and feel

I wasn't suggesting using wxWindows itself. Rather, I was suggesting
using the same approach, i.e. a common "veneer" on top of native
widgets (as opposed to actually implementing the widgets in Haskell).

-- 
Glynn Clements <[email protected]>