Re: Another call for votes
Nick Name <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.gui |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:45:07 +0100 Wolfgang Thaller <[email protected]> wrote: > > 4d) First wait and see if 4c is implementable; if not, fall back > to 4b. Well, I agree on everything and would directly vote for 4b, but instead I ask: what is the true problem here? If callbacks are serialized, what's the problem in allowing any thread to call CGA functions? There is a chance that some windowing system allows this. For example, mutual exclusion could be required for drawing on a surface, but not for registering a callback, so while a thread is drawing, another could be allowed to register callbacks. Could someone explain what are the problems? Vincenzo