Re: Example for thought

--- David Sankel <[email protected]> wrote:
> What would a haskell solution look like?  In my
> opinion this functionality would be very desirable
> if
> not required.
> 
Here is one solution using normal MVars.  It is IMHO
uglier than the c++ version.  I think creating an
extention of MVars to allow callbacks on change and
syncronized variables would be very nice with this
example problem.  I would also suggest removing the
empty MVar status.